#!/usr/bin/perl # # SCTP Conformance Test Suite Implementation # (C) Copyright Fujitsu Ltd. 2008, 2009 # # This file is part of the SCTP Conformance Test Suite implementation. # # The SCTP Conformance Test Suite implementation is free software; # you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of # the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by # the Free Software Foundation. # # The SCTP Conformance Test Suite implementation is distributed in the # hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even # the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR # PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. # # You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License # along with GNU CC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to # the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, # Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. # # Please send any bug reports or fixes you make to the # email address(es): # networktest sctp # # Or submit a bug report through the following website: # http://networktest.sourceforge.net/ # # Written or modified by: # Hiroaki Kago # Wei Yongjun # # Any bugs reported given to us we will try to fix... any fixes shared will # be incorporated into the next SCTP release. # ############################################################################## BEGIN { $V6evalTool::TestVersion = '$Name: REL_1_0_0 $'; } use lib "../common"; use V6evalTool; use SCTP; %pktdesc = ( icmp_proto_unreach => "Send ICMP message (with the Initiate Tag does not match)", ); $IF0 = Link0; vCapture($IF0); sctpCheckEnv($IF0); sctpStartClient($IF0); vLogHTML('================ Main Test ================='); %ret = vWarpRecv($IF0, 15, 0, 0, sctp_chunk_init_rcv); if($ret{status} != 0 || $ret{recvFrame} ne sctp_chunk_init_rcv) { vLogHTML('Cannot receive SCTP CHUNK_INIT
'); vLogHTML('NG'); exit $V6evalTool::exitFail; } vSend($IF0, icmp_proto_unreach); # ICMP message is silently discard, retranslate CHUNK_INIT %ret = vWarpRecv($IF0, 15, 0, 0, sctp_chunk_init_rcv); if($ret{status} != 0 || $ret{recvFrame} ne sctp_chunk_init_rcv) { vLogHTML('Cannot receive SCTP CHUNK_INIT
'); vLogHTML('NG'); exit $V6evalTool::exitFail; } sctpFetchInitField(\%ret); vSend($IF0, sctp_chunk_abort_snd); vLogHTML(OK); exit $V6evalTool::exitPass; ###################################################################### __END__ =head1 NAME ICMP_BadInitTag.seq - Handling ICMP message with Verification Tag is 0 and the Initiate Tag does not match =head1 PURPOSE To check the receiver silently discard ICMP message with Verification Tag is 0 and the Initiate Tag does not match. =head1 SYNOPSIS =begin html
  ./ICMP_BadInitTag.seq [-tooloption ...] -pkt ./ICMP_BadInitTag.def
    -tooloption : v6eval tool option
  See Also: ../common/STD_PKT_COMMON.def
            ../common/SCTP_COMMON.def
=end html =head1 PRE-TEST CONDITION Association not established between endpoint A and B. Also arrange the data in endpoint B such that upper layers send Associate primitive to startup an association with endpoint A. =head1 TEST PROCEDURE Endpoint A Endpoint B ULP (CLOSED) (CLOSED) <----- Associate <---------------- INIT ICMP -----------------> Silently discard (Initiate Tag does not match) <---------------- INIT TEST DESCRIPTION: 1. Attempt to terminate an association between endpoint A and endpoint B by sending ICMP message with Verification Tag is 0 and the Initiate Tag does not match. 2. Check A: ICMP message is silently discard. 3. Check B: INIT message is sent again after expiry of T1-Init timer. =head1 NOTE None =head1 REFERENCE RFC 4960 Appendix C. ICMP Handling Whenever an ICMP message is received by an SCTP endpoint, the following procedures MUST be followed to ensure proper utilization of the information being provided by layer 3. ICMP1) An implementation MAY ignore all ICMPv4 messages where the type field is not set to "Destination Unreachable". ICMP2) An implementation MAY ignore all ICMPv6 messages where the type field is not "Destination Unreachable", "Parameter Problem",, or "Packet Too Big". ICMP3) An implementation MAY ignore any ICMPv4 messages where the code does not indicate "Protocol Unreachable" or "Fragmentation Needed". ICMP4) An implementation MAY ignore all ICMPv6 messages of type "Parameter Problem" if the code is not "Unrecognized Next Header Type Encountered". ICMP5) An implementation MUST use the payload of the ICMP message (v4 or v6) to locate the association that sent the message to which ICMP is responding. If the association cannot be found, an implementation SHOULD ignore the ICMP message. =begin html
    ICMP6) An implementation MUST validate that the Verification Tag
           contained in the ICMP message matches the Verification Tag of
           the peer.  If the Verification Tag is not 0 and does NOT
           match, discard the ICMP message.  If it is 0 and the ICMP
           message contains enough bytes to verify that the chunk type is
           an INIT chunk and that the Initiate Tag matches the tag of the
           peer, continue with ICMP7.  If the ICMP message is too short
           or the chunk type or the Initiate Tag does not match, silently
           discard the packet.
=end html ICMP7) If the ICMP message is either a v6 "Packet Too Big" or a v4 "Fragmentation Needed", an implementation MAY process this information as defined for PATH MTU discovery. ICMP8) If the ICMP code is an "Unrecognized Next Header Type Encountered" or a "Protocol Unreachable", an implementation MUST treat this message as an abort with the T bit set if it does not contain an INIT chunk. If it does contain an INIT chunk and the association is in the COOKIE-WAIT state, handle the ICMP message like an ABORT. ICMP9) If the ICMPv6 code is "Destination Unreachable", the implementation MAY mark the destination into the unreachable state or alternatively increment the path error counter. Note that these procedures differ from [RFC1122] and from its requirements for processing of port-unreachable messages and the requirements that an implementation MUST abort associations in response to a "protocol unreachable" message. Port-unreachable messages are not processed, since an implementation will send an ABORT, not a port unreachable. The stricter handling of the "protocol unreachable" message is due to security concerns for hosts that do NOT support SCTP.